-
I'd love to see what these fag lovers would say if asked how they'd feel if their kid turned out to be gay.
I can see it now. "Oh, I wouldn't mind. It wouldn't bother me at all because I think being gay is okay". http://www.hostboard.com/forums/
Yeah, I'm sure none of you fag lovers would mind explaining to your friends at the supermarket who "that other guy holding the poodle" is in the Pink Christmas card they just got. http://www.hostboard.com/forums/
Buttspray, you make a very approprite link between liberals and fag supporters. The Democratic party has long been the hangout for the losers and outcasts of society, who need a fuckin' 12-step program of a political party that's willing to hear your affliction, and then in unison say "Hi Nimrod's name".
Biggest bunch of hypocritical bullshit I've ever heard.
------------------
inaacpkyfag - (n) 1. the art of kicking one's own ass 2. the act of knowing you're a worthless piece of shit 3. slang a board bitch
-
Maybe homosexuality is God's way of curbing overpopulation. How do you know that by speaking out against it you are not pissing off your God?
------------------
"Doctor says I wouldn't get so many nose bleeds if I just kept my finger outa there"
-
Hey, who's this "God" you keep referring to? Any evidence for any such being or presence--beyond your inner gut feeling? No? So, you may as well be speaking of the "Easter Bunny" when invoking some assumed Moral Authority overseeing all your decisions and actions? Okay, just so we're clear.
The "mentally ill perverts" to whom mscvl refers are obviously not the average homosexual, but such a description does suit to a tee the priesthood of the Catholic Church. Here in S.F., as well as in Boston, the dioceses are finalizing MASSIVE payouts to the hundreds of victims of the (typical) pedophile priest.
But, if you're really concerned about children being abused by the adults charged with their care, why are you ignoring the hetero abuse of children, which is hundreds of times more common than the abuse by homos--and every bit as damaging.
Fact is, you Christian yahoos are so stupid and silly, turning your typically weak arguments over is like flipping pancakes.
------------------
-
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Friend Of Ours:
But, if you're really concerned about children being abused by the adults charged with their care, why are you ignoring the hetero abuse of children, which is hundreds of times more common than the abuse by homos--and every bit as damaging.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Nobody is ignoring child abuse. That's why it's against the law. That's why we spend millions on social workers and other programs to help the victims of abuse.
Keep lying, faggot.
------------------
-
Well of course it's against the law, moron, but deal with the fact that hetero abuse of children is hundreds of times more prevelant (outside the church). Are you really so tunnel-visioned that you can't deal with a simple point?
------------------
-
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Friend Of Ours:
Hey, who's this "God" you keep referring to? Any evidence for any such being or presence--beyond your inner gut feeling? No? So, you may as well be speaking of the "Easter Bunny" when invoking some assumed Moral Authority overseeing all your decisions and actions? Okay, just so we're clear.
The "mentally ill perverts" to whom mscvl refers are obviously not the average homosexual, but such a description does suit to a tee the priesthood of the Catholic Church. Here in S.F., as well as in Boston, the dioceses are finalizing MASSIVE payouts to the hundreds of victims of the (typical) pedophile priest.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
While the church does draw some Pedophiles they are not the typical Catholic preist by a long shot. You can't propogate one stereotype while battleing another. In other words, you can't be blindly anti-religious in a post combating people who are blindly homophobic.
Secondly, on the matter of the whole thread I don't know if gay couples should be able to have children. Are single mothers and fathers? Yes, are convicts out of prison? yes, both of those could potentially indoctrinate kids, but you'd hear an outcry if you even mentioned one. I do agree that there is much more of a chance the kid will get messed up coming from a homosexual household. That said I know people who have come out of homosexual households and none are gay. I think you might have a bit of an arguement though, until you start throwing around all the crap about how they can't have custody of kids because god says so. Then you're just speeking out your ass.
------------------
-
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by ElGRANDPEEHOLE:
Yeah right, nice fucking article:rolleyesbigfuckingtime:!
Those supposed 35 homophobic men were planted their by the homosexual community. To further their sick agenda. How do I know you ask?
BECAUSE NO SELF RESPECTING HETEROSEXUAL MALE WOULD SIT THROUGH A SESSION OF WATCHING TWO MEN BURY THEIR PURPLE HEADED MISSILES INTO ONE ANOTHER'S RECTUMS WITHOUT THROWING UP ALL OVER HIMSELF!
Therefore, there is no doubt in my mind that this research committee was made up of entirely gay, cock slobbering researchers.
Nice try JSC, but some of us aren't buying into the lie, your homosexual community is trying to brainwash us with.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
uh, fuggity fuggity fuggin rack?
Innnnnnnndoooooobidibly!
The same pole smokers who do these bogus studies remind me of the fat ass female "scientist" who "proves" that all women have genes that cause more fat to develop in their ass and hips.
Fatass women are not fat because of their lack of exercise or the 10 Twinkies, bag of Doritoes and Diet Coke they had as a "snack," but from a "natural female gene."
Just bullshit to make them feel better.
------------------
fukk me running
-
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Friend Of Ours:
Well of course it's against the law, moron, but deal with the fact that hetero abuse of children is hundreds of times more prevelant (outside the church). Are you really so tunnel-visioned that you can't deal with a simple point?
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Your point is specious and irrelevant. The issue at hand is sick perverts adopting kids.
------------------
-
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by ElGRANDPEEHOLE:
Yeah right, nice fucking article:rolleyesbigfuckingtime:!
Those supposed 35 homophobic men were planted their by the homosexual community. To further their sick agenda. How do I know you ask?
BECAUSE NO SELF RESPECTING HETEROSEXUAL MALE WOULD SIT THROUGH A SESSION OF WATCHING TWO MEN BURY THEIR PURPLE HEADED MISSILES INTO ONE ANOTHER'S RECTUMS WITHOUT THROWING UP ALL OVER HIMSELF!
Therefore, there is no doubt in my mind that this research committee was made up of entirely gay, cock slobbering researchers.
Nice try JSC, but some of us aren't buying into the lie, your homosexual community is trying to brainwash us with.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
uh, fuggity fuggity fuggin rack?
Innnnnnnndoooooobidibly!
The same pole smokers who do these bogus studies remind me of the fat ass female "scientist" who "proves" that all women have genes that cause more fat to develop in their ass and hips.
Fatass women are not fat because of their lack of exercise or the 10 Twinkies, bag of Doritoes and Diet Coke they had as a "snack," but from a "natural female gene."
Just bullshit to make them feel better.
But back to El's point- I'd rather just say, "Ok, your studies are all correct" than be subject to watching.....shudder....the two worst words in the English Dictionary....gay porn. FUCK!
Even if these straight dudes actually DID sit down and watch this...I also like how the study mentioned that the subjects had to watch male on male as well as lesbians. Well of course those dudes popped woods after seeing the lesbo action- unless it was IB and one of her fellow buzz-cut carpet-munchers going at it.....
------------------
fukk me running
-
RACKS to El for his incessant militancy against the gay lifestyle. Also, RACKS to Smackie and Meds for carrying on a fairly good conversation, although Smackie clearly smacks Meds pretty good, exposing Meds for his many generalizations and stereotypes.
On the one hand, folks who CHOOSE to be gay, I have no problem with. I feel neither threatened nor concerned that ?Gays are gonna take over the world? as El would have you believe.
On the other hand, I do feel that homosexuality is a deviant sexual behavior. Inasmuch, I do believe that permitting ?life-partners, http://www.hostboard.com/forums/ ? to adopt children will lend itself to those people pressuring their adopted children to assume that lifestyle, as it is a learned trait, i.e., University of Michigan offering the course, ?How To Be Gay.?
No one has concluded that being gay/homo is a genetic trait. Some studies have purported to ?suggest? that ?correlation?s? exists, but no conclusive evidence, and until I see that, being gay/homo is being a sexual deviant.
